India’s Digital Shield: Advancing Cyber Resilience

India’s Digital Shield: Advancing Cyber Resilience

As cyber warfare becomes a new frontier of conflict, nations must prioritise digital self-reliance to protect their critical infrastructure. Empowering local innovation and reducing technological dependence are essential to securing a sovereign and resilient cyberspace.

By leena

Introduction

Self-reliance in the digital domain defines the capacity of a nation to conceive, develop, and deploy indigenous digital technologies that encompass cyber defence tools, data infrastructure, and AI-above any dependencies on foreign-supplied technologies. It covers technological sovereignty across the full digital stack, from semiconductor chips, operating systems, and threat detection algorithms, to secure-cloud platforms. Cybersecurity self-reliance, therefore, ensures that mission-critical systems maintain resilience.

What Are Digital Assets?

In cybersecurity, digital assets refer to any digital components, hardware, software, data, or service that bear strategic, operational, or economic value and therefore must be protected against cyber threats. These assets are not just technical components; they constitute the digital crown jewels of a State or an organization-the digital infrastructure, innovation, and resilience.

Why Digital Assets Are Important

Ensure operational continuity across sectors like defence, healthcare, finance, and governance. Ensure data sovereignty, i.e., that sensitive information is retained under national or organizational control. Ensure strategic autonomy, especially in certain areas of indigenous chip design, secure cloud platform, and AI governance. Lead the value creation because cybersecurity is increasingly being viewed not just as a defensive measure but as an enabler of innovation and strategic growth.

The Evolving Nature of Cyber Threats

Increasing Frequency and Sophistication of Cyberattacks. In recent years, cyberattacks have increased both in number and in severity. Ransomware attacks brought in an estimated value of over $450 million in 2024 alone, while supply chain attacks rose by 68% from the previous year. APTs and ransomware groups currently operate in conjunction, straddling the line between state-sponsored and profit-driven actors. Vishing attacks purportedly increased 442%, and AI-generated phishing emails achieved a 54% click-through rate as compared to only 12% from human writers.

 

Importance of Digital Self-Reliance

Reduced dependence on foreign digital technologies (hardware/software):

In the History of Foreign Dependency in India’s digital infrastructure, foreign technology has historically been put to various uses: cloud service providers, cybersecurity software, semiconductors, or high-tech chips for Artificial Intelligence. The danger in such a dependency arises whenever geopolitical upheavals set in, restricting timely releases, adequate support, or even core service availability.

For example:

AI Chips with RISC-V Architecture, BharOS and GaN Power Devices:

Ensuring national data sovereignty and cybersecurity:

In the protection of sensitive data, especially from the Intelligence and Finance or Governance sectors, India must ensure protection against any unauthorized entry. This is where sovereign cloud models are coming up as a possible solution, most likely retaining an ability to locally host critical data on behalf of a government while operationalizing control, compliance, and security.

For Example:

The Digital Personal Data Protection Act (2023) and the Jan Vishwas Amendment Act, 2023

MeitY Guidelines for Cloud Services

Under the MeghRaj Policy, MeitY empanels Cloud Service Providers (CSPs) for government use.

Guidelines ensure:

1. Data localization within India.
2. Compliance with IT Act provisions.
3. Procurement models that support public cloud, virtual private cloud, and government community cloud deployments

• Global frameworks (e.g., GDPR) as comparative examples

The EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) sets high standards for data privacy, consent, and breach notification.

Key principles:

1. Right to be forgotten, data portability, and privacy by design.
2. Strong enforcement through independent supervisory authorities and cross-border cooperation.

Challenges to Achieving Self-Reliance

Strategic Imperative of Digital Self-Reliance in Cybersecurity:

Self-reliance in the digital arena empowers India to sidestep emerging threats from supply chain disruptions, foreign surveillance, and acts of geopolitical bullying. Such self-reliance will also allow custom-built innovations on Indian requirements, mainly in multilingual interfacing for cybersecurity, local cultural model testing for data governance, and larger-scale solutions for rural connectivity. However, for such a big idea to exist, the road will stretch well beyond a mere tech substitution and would have to be a complete overhaul of India’s digital policy, industrial base, and human capital.

Talent and skill gaps in cybersecurity:

With a workforce shortage of more than 4 million globally in cybersecurity, there are also specific skill gaps in India in the areas of network engineering, threat intelligence, and secure architecture design.

Challenges:

1. Limited access across training and certifications of specializations.
2. Some gender and ethnic groups are still almost unrepresented in cybersecurity roles.
3. Limited job availability at the entry level, and mentorship programs have the same plight.

An Indian Cybersecurity Startup’s Funding and Scalability Problem:

According to some estimates, India is home to over 1,400 cybersecurity startups, but just 235 have stores. The reason for this is threefold: ambivalence over monetization, limited global scale, and complexity of the domain being pitched in.

Barriers:

1. Slow domestic market adoption.
2. Technically complex and difficult to assess cybersecurity.
3. Lack of investor familiarity for a much lesser-known domain, contrasted against SaaS or fintech.

Interoperability and Compliance with Global Tech Standards:

India’s digital systems often remain fragmented from global interoperability frameworks as defined by the European Interoperability Framework and GDPR.

Concerns:

1. Data governance frameworks remain fragmented across sectors.
2. Low adoption of semantic and technical standards (e.g., API, metadata protocol).

Way Forward

1. Set Up a National Cybersecurity Innovation Fund

Purpose: Support local startups working on quantum-safe encryption, AI-based threat detection, and security for hardware

Impact: Lessens dependence on foreign technologies and accelerates homegrown solutions

2. Develop a Digital Sovereignty Index

Purpose: Benchmark India’s control over digital infrastructure, data flows, and tech stack

Impact: Assist in strategic planning and comparisons with other nations; induce policymaking interventions

3. Make Indigenous Security Standards Mandatory for Critical Infrastructures

Purpose: Set and enforce India-specific cybersecurity standards in telecommunication, energy, defence, and banking

Impact: Reduces risks due to faults or threats inherent in imported systems; aligns these threats with national threat models

4. Establish Cybersecurity Fellowships for Young Innovators

Purpose: Identification and development of young talent in ethical hacking, secure coding, and cyber policy

Impact: Creating a future-ready workforce; stay well-grounded in terms of grassroots innovation.

5. Development of a Decentralized Cyber Threat Intelligence Grid for Cyber Threat Intelligence

Purpose: To foster real-time sharing of threat-related data among government, industry, and academia using blockchain or federated systems.

Impact: Situational awareness, as well as occasional rapid response, is increased.

6. Set Up Regional Cybersecurity Command Centres

Purpose: Decentralize response capabilities across different zones, i.e., north, south, east, and west region-based AI monitor.

Impact: Enable agility and support in the mitigation of threats at a local level, especially at Tier-II and Tier-III level cities.

Conclusion

Digital self-reliance is not merely a technological initiative in India; rather, it is a strategic need in an era where cyber conflicts and digital interdependence are catalyzing the destruction of states. By supporting local innovations, strong cybersecurity regimes, and sovereign data ecosystems, the country can build digital borders and exercise greater control over its strategic assets.

The realization of such a vision requires sustainable, integrated, and coordinated efforts from various stakeholders such as the government, industry, academia, and civil society. It requires ethical governance, technically advanced capacity, and international collaboration based on national interest, within its very technological ambit.

Essentially, a self-reliant digital infrastructure guarantees a secure and sovereign digital future, well-resilient and additionally equipped to take the lead in setting global standards for fair and secure cyberspace.

References

1. Sunita, & Samal, A. (2025). India’s national security in the digital age: Addressing cybersecurity threats and policy gaps. International Journal of Arts, Humanities and Social Studies, 7(1), 524–531. https://www.socialstudiesjournal.com/archives/2025/vol7issue1/PartG/7-1-90-324.pdf
2. Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology. (2023). Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023. https://www.meity.gov.in/content/digital-personal-data-protection-act-2023
3. Press Information Bureau. (2025, September). Government’s multi-agency approach to cybersecurity. https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=2116341
4. CERT-In. (2023). Cyber Security Guidelines for Government Organisations. https://www.cert-in.org.in
5. MeitY. (2022). Guidelines for Cloud Service Providers. https://www.meity.gov.in/content/meity-guidelines-cloud-services
6. National Critical Information Infrastructure Protection Centre. (2023). Annual Threat Assessment Report. https://www.nciipc.gov.in
7. C3iHub. (2024). Cybersecurity Innovation and Skilling Programs. https://www.c3ihub.org
8. Kumar, A., & Kumari, R. (2024). Digital transformation and sustainability in India. Indian Institute of Public Policy Series, 12(3), 45–58.
9. Tan, Y., et al. (2025). Strategic interdependence and innovation ecosystems: Lessons from China. International Studies Quarterly, 69(2), 210–225.
10. Faza, M., & Lestari, D. (2025). Self-regulated learning in digital education. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 26(1), 88–102.
11. Data Security Council of India. (2023). Cybersecurity Startup Landscape in India. https://www.dsci.in
12. Observer Research Foundation. (2023). India’s Cyber Diplomacy Strategy. https://www.orfonline.org
13. Internet Governance Forum India. (2023). Digital Sovereignty and Global Norms. https://www.igf.org.in
14. Indian Computer Emergency Response Team. (2023). Threat Intelligence Exchange Platform Overview. https://www.cert-in.org.in
15. Ministry of Home Affairs. (2023). Indian Cybercrime Coordination Centre (I4C). https://www.mha.gov.in
16. RBI. (2023). Cloud Adoption Guidelines for Financial Institutions. https://www.rbi.org.in
17. Prophaze Technologies. (2024). The Great Indian Firewall: Indigenous Cybersecurity Solutions. https://www.prophaze.com
18. IIT Ropar. (2024). AWaDH: Advanced Wireless and Security Research Hub. https://www.iitrpr.ac.in/awadh
19. European Commission. (2023). GAIA-X: A Federated Data Infrastructure for Europe. https://www.gaia-x.eu